There is an opinion piece on the economics of windpower, or lack of it, in the Plattsburgh Press Republican. The author, John Droz Jr. makes some seemingly sensible points about the lack of economic viability of wind power. He published the
same letter in the Thousand Island Sun.
But there is no information about John Droz Jr. Who is he? As far as I can tell he is a retired (?) physicist who lives in Brantingham Lake, NY. But he is also a
real estate broker who deals exclusively with selling lakefront property. Someone who might not much care for wind turbines obstructing potential property buyers views.
But what about his points about wind power?
1. There is no environmental benefit to wind power generated energy because the energy cannot be stored. This seems to be a reasonable point. The energy from wind must be used when it is being produced. If it cannot be used instantly it is wasted energy.
But Mr. Droz is being bit disingenuous. Wind energy is not currently being stored but
there are ways to store it and
here. Surely as a physicist he could even come up with a idea or two about how to store energy. How about using the electricity generated to produce hydrogen gas from water? Remember the "hydrogen economy"? Storing excess electricity should be a concern to all energy producers.
2. It is being promoted because it is an extremely lucrative business opportunity. Who doesn't like an extremely lucrative business proposal? Oh, but it's subsidized by the taxpayer. Aerospace, transportation, industrial and farms, telecommunications, and electronics industries also receive tax subsidies from the government. Surely other sources of energy production are
subsidized by the taxpayer also and
here. If we are going to complain about tax subsidies, let's propose to take away all tax subsidies to big corporations.
Sorry, but I've still yet to hear a really valid reasons to be opposed to wind power.